Specimen under review, no consensus reached

Casefile DOCROG, classification stalemate.

No test decides DOG or FROG. It is both; the lab won’t write it down.

Rotating model plate of DocRog on a gridded slab — Plate 1, subject at rest, grid floor, 15:17.

Badge strip

Field intake

Specimen DocRog (DOCROG-001) Species, pending entry Review Pending Peer Review Capture Rotating model plate, 10 cm grid floor Handling No de-frog or de-dog in text, curator signoff required

Polygon-count tag: 3,482, verified at idle spin speed

Status field

Hover to witness failure

Classification

Classification impasse logged; see Diagnose below.

DocRog checking its own reflection in a puddle

Felt board collage of DocRog reference plates and running sequence

Acquisition line, not yet open

The specimen isn’t catalogued for release. When it is, this is where the paperwork starts.

Behavior log

Stamped under glass

Primary vocalization: bark–ribbit (synchronous). Secondary: tail-wag ripple; ear-flatten during croak. Gait: tile-to-tile hops with canine hesitation. Reactivity: sniffs the camera, then blinks both sideways and forward. During diagnosis, subject emits one bark and one ribbit in perfect phase; frame tremor ±2 px registered.

Two pinned polaroids of DocRog on the felt board, close and receding down the grid floor

Known habitats

Field sightings

15:17Floor tiles: sun-warm squares by the door.

BrowserTrending tabs: opens five, stares at three, forgets why.

ReflectivePuddles: mirror checks; leaves a tidy paw-web print.

KitchenSnack drawers: single wet nose dot left on the glass.

DocRog tumbling mid-roll, sticker cut-out

Diagnostic routine

Result: pending your click

CONCLUSION: BOTH

1) Calibrating grid…
2) Counting toes…
3) Waveform match: bark ⇄ ribbit…
4) Cross-checking shed fur vs. shed skin…